Makaho fasinjan jirgin saman da Federal Air Marshal ya tsorata: Shin Delta Air Lines ne abin dogaro?

A cikin labarin dokar tafiya ta wannan makon, mun bincika batun Gardner da United States of America, Delta Air Lines, Shari'a mai lamba 1: 14-cv-00125-JNP-DBP (D. Utah Yuni 8, 2018) a cikin Kotun ya lura cewa “Ronald Gardner ya kai karar kamfanin jirgin Delta da Amurka don yin mu'amala da jirgin yaki ma Gardner (makaho ne) kuma ba ya jin magana kuma yana da kayan ji (kuma) yana da shekaru 59 a duniya.

Ranar 20 ga Janairu, 2011, Gardner ya kasance a cikin ajin farko na jirgin Delta daga Washington, DC zuwa Salt Lake City. Su ma jiragen asirin na gwamnatin tarayya biyu (FAM1 da FAM2) suma suna cikin jirgin. FAM1 yana zaune kai tsaye a bayan Gardner (kuma) yana da ƙafa 6 ƙafa inci 2, yana da nauyin 235, kuma yana aiki mai ɗaukar nauyi. Bayan tashinsa, Gardner ya fara kwantar da kansa a hankali. Ya ji wani mummunan tashin hankali a bayan kujerar sa… Bayan minti biyar zuwa goma, Gardner ya fara sake shimfida kujerar sa a karo na biyu. An buga kujerarsa ta baya da karfi sosai, lamarin da ya haifar… Gardner ya yi tsalle a gaban kujerarsa… Bayan 'yan mintoci kaɗan, Gardner ya yi ƙoƙari ya sake zaunar da kujerarsa a karo na uku, amma FAM1 ya sake tura kujerar gaba…

Gardner ya je wurin shakatawa (kuma ya yi korafi kuma) mai kula da jirgin ya lura cewa Gardner yana 'girgiza a zahiri', gumi da shan iska llow Babban mai kula da jirgin ya yi magana da FAM1 (da) [g] Iven FAM1 matakin tashin hankali yayin tattaunawar kuma kasancewar yana dauke da makamai, ma'aikacin jirgin nan da nan ya damu da jin dadin Gardner da sauran fasinjojin da ke cikin jirgin. (Gardner ya koma wurin zamansa inda FAM1 ya biyo shi) wanda ya kama kujerar Gardner ya 'goyi bayanta'… Shugaban mai kula da jirgin ya zo wurin zaman Gardner, ya tsugunna ya ce 'Ba laifi. Yana cikin tarin shirme. Fadar marshal ce ta tarayya '…

Bayan ya sauka, Gardner ya tashi amma FAM1 ya toshe shi ya ce, “Gafarta dai, zan samu jakata '. FAM1 bai motsa ko ya ce komai ba a cikin martani. Gardner ya sake maimaita bukatarsa ​​ta samun FAM1 sau da yawa, na kimanin minti uku sai FAM1 ya kasance ba ya motsi kuma shiru silent Lokacin da suka shiga filin jirgin, Gardner ya gaya wa ma'aikacin filin jirgin na Delta cewa yana son buya don kaucewa gamuwa da (FAM1) ". Bayanin taƙaitaccen hukunci da aka baiwa Delta da kuma hukuncin taƙaitaccen hukuncin da aka baiwa Amurka ”.

A cikin karar Gardner, Kotun ta lura cewa “Gardner ya kai karar Delta da Amurka gaba daya bisa wannan lamarin (yana zargin) cewa haduwarsa da FAM1 ya sa shi fama da rikice-rikice na damuwa; damuwa; damuwa; na lokaci-lokaci, rashin damuwa da ke da nasaba da ƙaramar hangen nesa da yake da shi; fargaba; tsoron wuraren taro; rashin barci; da kuma yawan maimaita mafarki.

Gardner da yardar kansa ya kori biyu daga cikin dalilan aikin da ya tabbatar da farko, ya bar da'awar da ake yi wa Delta saboda (1) sakaci, (2) sakaci na baƙin ciki, (3) keta aikin jigilar jigila zuwa fasinja mai nakasa, (4) keta aiki a kan baƙon kasuwanci da (5) dalilin aiwatar da abin da Garner ya ambata a matsayin mai da'awa mafi girma superior Gardner ya kuma tabbatar da ƙararrakin da Amurka ta yi game da (1) sakaci, (2) ganganci na ɓacin rai, (3) sakaci na wahalar da hankali, (4) ɗaurin kurkuku na karya, (5) hari da (6) sanadiyyar aikin da Gardner ya sanya a matsayin mai da'awa mafi daɗi ”.

An ptedaddamar da Da'awar Delta

"Dokar jirgin sama ta Tarayya ta 1958 (FAA) ta ba da izini ga tsarin tarayya na masana'antar kamfanin jirgin sama. A shekarar 1978 Majalisar Wakilai ta yi wa FAA kwaskwarima tare da Dokar Ba da Lamarin Jirgin Sama (ADA) ADA ta haɗa da tanadi na tallafi claims ikirarin Gardner akan Delta ya tsaya akan ra'ayoyi daban daban guda uku. Da farko dai, Gardner yayi jayayya cewa shugaban bautar jirgin cikin sakaci ya gaya masa cewa FAM1 jirgin sama ne, wanda ya haifar masa da damuwa da damuwa. Na biyu, ya tabbatar da cewa babban mai tsaron jirgin ya kasa rakiyar shi da sauri daga jirgin bayan ya jawo shi ya jira a kujerar sa kuma ya kasa shiga tsakani lokacin da FAM1 ya toshe hanyar. Na uku, ya yi jayayya cewa ma'aikatan Delta sun kasa hana FAM1 bi shi ta tashar jirgin sama.

Mai dangantaka da Delta's Service

Delta tana jayayya cewa duk waɗannan ra'ayoyin lamuran abin dogaro ne da sabis na Delta. Kashi na Goma ya fassara kalmar 'sabis na jigilar iska' gabaɗaya: 'Abubuwan sabis na jigilar iska… sun haɗa da abubuwa kamar tikiti, hanyoyin shiga jirgi, samar da abinci da abin sha, da kula da kaya, ban da jigilar kansa' ' A karkashin wannan ma'anar 'sabis', ikirarin Gardner akan Delta yana da 'alaƙa da ko magana game da' hidimar Delta… Sauran kotunan da suka bincika irin wannan ikirarin sun yanke hukuncin cewa an riga an shirya su pted Saboda haka, kotu ta yanke hukuncin cewa sakacin da Gardner ya yi na ɓacin rai da'awar damuwa kuma da'awar gafalarsa an bayyana karara ”.

Da'awar Kan Amurka

“Shaidun, wadanda aka dauka cikin hasken da yafi dacewa da ikirarin Gardner, ya nuna cewa a lokacin da Gardner yayi yunkurin kwanciya kan kujerarsa a lokuta mabambanta uku, FAM1 da karfi ya tura shi gaba. Daga baya, FAM1 ya girgiza kujerar Gardner yayin da yake zaune don tsoratar da shi ta zahiri. FAM1 ya yarda cewa ya gano Gardner makaho ne kafin jirgin ya sauka. Kuma ganin cewa babban hadimin jirgin da fasinjan da ke zaune kusa da Gardner sun fahimci cewa aikin na FAM1 ya girgiza shi, wani mai gano gaskiyar zai iya yanke hukuncin cewa FAM1 shima ya san cewa ya tsoratar da Gardner har ta kai ga yana girgiza, zufa da kuma zurfafawa numfashi. Duk da wannan ilimin, mun jira tare da Gardner (kuma) yayin da Gardner ya yi yunƙurin fita daga jirgin, FAM1 da gangan ya toshe shi ta hanyar tsayawa a cikin layin na minti uku. A wannan lokacin FAM1 ya yi biris da buƙatun Gardner don ya motsa don Gardner ya samu wucewa. Daga nan sai FAM1 ya bi Gardner har cikin filin jirgin saman don ƙara tsoratar da shi.

Kammalawa

Idan aka tattara wadannan hujjojin tare, mai gaskiya mai gaskiya zai iya yanke hukuncin cewa ya kamata FAM1 ya fahimci cewa halinsa yana tattare da haɗarin rashin hankali na haifar da Gardner fuskantar ƙuncin rai. Bugu da ƙari, mai ba da gaskiya yana iya yanke shawara cewa FAM1 ya kamata ya fahimci cewa wahalar na iya haifar da rashin lafiya ko cutar da jiki. Don haka Kotun ta ki amincewa da bukatar da Amurka ta gabatar game da yanke hukunci kan hukuncin da Gardner ya yi na yin sakaci game da abin da FAM1 ya yi ”.

Patricia da Tom Dickerson

Marubucin, Thomas A. Dickerson, ya mutu ne a ranar 26 ga Yulin, 2018 yana da shekara 74. Ta hanyar alherin dangin sa, eTurboNews ana ba shi damar raba abubuwan da muke da su a kan fayil wanda ya aiko mana don bugawa a mako-mako.

Hon. Dickerson ya yi ritaya a matsayin Mataimakin Alkalin Kotun daukaka kara, Sashi na biyu na Kotun Koli ta Jihar New York kuma ya yi rubutu game da Dokar Balaguro na tsawon shekaru 42 gami da litattafan da yake sabuntawa na shekara-shekara, Dokar Tafiya, Lauyan Jarida (2018), Litigating International Torts in Kotunan Amurka, Thomson Reuters WestLaw (2018), Ayyuka na Aji: Dokar 50 ta Amurka, Law Journal Press (2018), da sama da sharuɗɗan doka 500 waɗanda yawancinsu ana samunsu a nycourts.gov/courts/9jd/taxcertatd.shtml. Don ƙarin labarai na dokar tafiya da ci gaba, musamman a cikin membobin membobin EU, duba IFTTA.org.

Karanta yawancin labaran Justice Dickerson nan.

Ba za a sake buga wannan labarin ba tare da izini ba.